Crittenden County, KY Historical Society Tintypes
             
               


 

Crittenden County, KY Historical Society - Tintypes

 

The Tintypes

     The images on this page are from loose tintypes at the Crittenden County, KY Historical Society.  Scans of them were graciously supplied by Steve Eskew, the same person who supplied scans of the Cochran family photos.   This album is the first of two that reside in the Crittenden Co., KY Historical Society collection.  I was kindly allowed to use a laptop and a scanner to copy the photos. 

     Tintypes of this era are often rather dark, as are their scans.  The images were adjusted for contrast and brightness to facilitate the identifications.  

 

Numbering

     These photographs comprise part of five collections of photographs from Crittenden Co., KY, displayed on five separate web pages as follows:
    
1) FPY Loose Photos - a collection of loose photographs originally belonging to Florence (Pierce) Yandell (1861-1938), which were found in the attic of the house she formerly occupied.  These are numbered FPY 001 through FPY 192.
     2) Crittenden County Historical Society (CCHS) Album No. 1, an album in the collection of the Crittenden Co., KY Historical Society.  These are numbered CCHS 197 through CCHS 248. 
     3) Crittenden County Historical Society (CCHS) Album No. 2, another album at the Crittenden Co., KY Historical Society.  These are numbered CCHS 249 through CCHS 279.
     4) Cochran family photos.  These are numbered C001 through C062.
     5) Crittenden County Historical Society loose tintypes.  These are numbered CT0005 through CT0025.

 

Order of the Photographs

     The order of numbering of the CCHS photographs in the two albums was as they appeared front to back in the album.  In this case, some photos might have been mounted  adjacent to each other, e.g., a husband and wife facing each other in sequential pages. or children next to parents.  Therefore, the order of CCHS photographs may have significance, and should be kept in mind during identification.  Photographs in the other three collections are assumed to have no specific order, and are presented in more or less arbitary order.

 

Identification

     Most of the photos are not identified, but a few were either marked on the back or by inscriptions on the album page. 

     The filename of each photograph is given to the right in order to keep the notes associated with the correct photo.  These filenames may have names and appear to identify the subject, but they were tentative guesses made at the time of scanning and may be completely wrong.  Please pay attention to the notes below the filenames, which represent the most recent identification and reason/logic for the identification.

     Where such a back or album inscriptions was present, it is described in the notes to the right of the thumbnail.  Since a photograph is not generally removed from its place in the album (which tends to rip the album), such back inscriptions are assumed to have been written by the original album owner and written contemporaneously with the photography.  Therefore, back inscriptions are assumed to be correct unless overwhelming evidence shows them not to be.

     Where there is an inscription on the album page, it was usually added by a member of the historical society.  Such an inscription would have been added much later than the year when the photograph was taken.  The inscribing person might be basing the identification on knowing the person during their lifetime and recognizing them at a younger age, or basing the identification on having seen a copy of the same photograph or other photographs of the subject that had been already identified.  Album inscription are therefore dependent on the memory of a local person, and tend to be correct, but not necessarily so.

     When a photographer's logo or name is present on the photo mount, it is also quoted in the notes; the location in which a photo was taken often provides an important clue as to the identity of the subject, as well as a probable important location in the life of the subject, such as a school location.

     The firmest identifications of unmarked photographs are those involving the James Perry Pierce extended family, for which there exist a large number of other photographs that were identified and mounted by a member of the family shortly after the photographs were taken.  The Cochran family also has several photos containing a large number of identified persons, allowing other photos of them to be firmly identified.

     When the identity of the subject of a photograph is uncertain based on other photographs that are already identified, a primitive facial recognition method is used, in which the photo to be identified is 1) cropped so that the eyes are exactly horizontal, 2) sized so that the head top to chin distance is the same as an identified photograph to which it is to be compared, 3) copied and pasted to a photoshop file containing the identified photograph, and finally, 4) comparing the width of the eyes, the width of the cheekbones, the position of the nose, the position of the mouth, and the presence of any other facial features, such as a cleft chin, freckles, moles, etc. 

     Leaps of logic, tenuous connections, and similar guess have been liberally used.  All identifications are to used with a grain of salt.

 

If I have made errors, and you have correct or additional identification/information, please contact me (mathew_brady@msn.com and allow me to correct the errors.

 

 

 

 

CT0005-Jacob A. Pierce (left), James P. Pierce (right)-500.jpg CT0005

 

comparison Jacob Ayhart Pierce ( 1842-1930) - 800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from Crittenden Tintypes (CT) only:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)  CT only-800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from other Crittenden pages:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-800h.jpg

 

 

CT0005:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Left: Jacob Ahart Pierce (1842-1930).  Right: James Perry Pierce (1841-1916).

Date:  c.1860; they appear to be about 20 years old.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Jacob Ahart Pierce (see also MISC 21).  Also, two strips of James Perry Pierce images, one from Crittenden Tintypes (see also MISC 012B) images only, and a long one below of images from all other pages (see also MISC 012A).  Image CT0005 is nearly identical to image FPY 053, only reversed due to it being a tintype.


CT0006-Darius B. Carnahan (1845-1917)-500.jpgCT0006-Darius B. Carnahan (1845-1917)-detail-500.jpg CT0006

Images known or suspected to be of Darius B. Carnahan
comparison Darius B. Carnahan (1845-1917)-800h.jpg

 

CT0006:  Tintype,  (~2x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Darius Bradford Carnahan (1845-1917).

Date:  c.1875; he appears to be about 30 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Darius B. Carnahan (see also MISC 055).

  


CT0007-comp-Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-500.jpg CT0007

Images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran
comparison Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-800h.jpg

 

CT0007:  Tintype,  (~1½x2¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1962).

Date:  c.1887; he appears to be about 25 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran (see also MISC 052).

  


CT0008-comp-Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-500.jpg CT0008

Images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran
comparison Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-800h.jpg

 

CT0008:  Tintype,  (~1½x2"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1962).

Date:  c.1887; he appears to be about 25 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran (see also MISC 052).

  


CT0009-comp-Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-500.jpg CT0009

Images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran
comparison Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-800h.jpg

 

CT0009:  Tintype,  (~1½x2¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1962).

Date:  c.1872; he appears to be about 10 years old.

Lower Image:

      Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran (see also MISC 052).

  


CT0010-top-John Watts Cochran (1877-1927)-left-Ruth Sarah (Farris) Pierce (1885-1975)-right-comp Farris, Eva (1883-1953)-500.jpg CT0010

Images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran
comparison Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1952)-800h.jpg

mages known or suspected to be of Sarah Elizabeth Cochran
comparison Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Mary Cochran
comparison Mary (Cochran) Miller (1858-1940), wife of Luther Miller-800h.jpg

 

CT0010:  Tintype,  (~2x3¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject: 

Top:  Thomas Henry Cochran (1862-1962),

Left:  Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926),

Right:  Mary Cochran (1858-1940).

     The identification of Thomas Henry Cochran is the most solid, in that he looks identical to C 062, a photograph that was contemporaneously captioned as to identity.  As he is photographed with two of his four sisters, it makes sense that they two closest in age to him, that is the two sisters from the first marriage of their father.  But not so easy to decide which sister, Mary or Sarah, is left or right, and it is pretty much a guess.  In the end, I went for the wider-faced woman to be Sarah, the the narrower-faced woman to be Mary, but there are features that could have made the choice the other way around.



Date: 

Lower Images:

      Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Thomas H. Cochran (see MISC 052), Mary Cochran (see MISC 69), and Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (see MISC 73).  

  


CT0011-same image as Florence Pierce Yandell 066-500.jpg CT0011

Images known or suspected to be of Dora Ann Cochran
comparison Dora Ann (Cochran) Rodgers (1867-1951)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Mary Cochran
comparison Mary (Cochran) Miller (1858-1940), wife of Luther Miller-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Sarah Elizabeth Cochran
comparison Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of John Watts Cochran
comparison John Watts Cochran (1877-1927)-800h.jpg

 

CT0011:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  All four daughters and one son of John Thomas Cochran (1834-1904) and his wives, 1) Sarah Jane Ross (1831-1860), and 2) Nancy Rebecca Moxley (1843-1923).

Standing:  1st L-R: Dora Ann Cochran (1867-1951),

                2nd L-R: Mary Cochran (1858-1940),

                 3rd L-R: Anna Cochran (1870-1960),

                 4th L-R: Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926).  

Sitting:  John Watts Cochran (1877-1927).

Date:  c.1897; he appears to be at least 20 years old, yet none of his sisters appear to be no more than 40.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Dora Ann (see MISC 74 ), Mary (see MISC 69), Anna (see MISC 066), Sarah Elizabeth (see MISC 73), and John Watts Cochran (see MISC 54).

  


CT0012-probably Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950)-500.jpg CT0012

Images known or suspected to be of Samuel George Cochran
comparison Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950)-800h.jpg

 

CT0012:  Tintype,  (~2½x3½"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  probably Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950).

Date:  c.1895; he appears to be about 20 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950) (see also MISC 64).

  


CT0013-James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-500.jpg CT0013

James Perry Pierce images from Crittenden Tintypes (CT) only:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)  CT only-800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from other Crittenden pages:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-800h.jpg


 

CT0013:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  James Perry Pierce (1841-1916).

Date:  c.1891; he appears to be about 50 years old.

Lower Images:

     Two comparison strips of images known or suspected to be of James Perry Pierce images - a short one of CT images (Crittenden Tintypes;see also MISC 012B), and a long one of images from all other pages (see also MISC 012A).

  


CT0014-left-Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950)-right-John Watts Cochran (1877-1927-500.jpg CT0014

Images known or suspected to be of Samuel George Cochran
comparison Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of John Watts Cochran


 

CT0014:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Left: Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950).  Right: John Watts Cochran (1877-1927).

Date:  c.1875; he appears to be about 30 years old.

Lower Images:

     Top: Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950) (see also MISC 64).  Bottom: Comparison of images known or suspected to be of John Watts Cochran (1877-1927) (see also MISC 54).

  


CT0015-Cochran sisters - top left Anna (1870), top right-Dora (1867), bottom left Sarah (1859), bottom right Mary (1858)-500.jpg CT0015

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Dora Ann Cochran
comparison Dora Ann (Cochran) Rodgers (1867-1951)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Sarah Elizabeth Cochran
comparison Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Mary Cochran
comparison Mary (Cochran) Miller (1858-1940), wife of Luther Miller-800h.jpg

 

CT0015:  Tintype,  (~2½x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  All four daughters and one son of John Thomas Cochran (1834-1904) and his wives, 1) Sarah Jane Ross (1831-1860), and 2) Nancy Rebecca Moxley (1843-1923).

Back Left:  Anna Cochran (1870-1960),

Back Right:  Dora Ann Cochran (1867-1951),

Front Left:  Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926),

Front Right:  Mary Cochran (1858-1940).

Date:  c.1888; Anna and Dora both appear to be no older that 20.  The others appear to older than about 30.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Anna (see MISC 066), Dora Ann (see MISC 74 ), Sarah Elizabeth (see MISC 73), and Mary (see MISC 69).

  


CT0016-James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-500.jpg CT0016

James Perry Pierce images from Crittenden Tintypes (CT) only:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)  CT only-800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from other Crittenden pages:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-800h.jpg

 

 

CT0016:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  James Perry Pierce (1841-1916) (1841-1916).

Date:  c.1854; he appears to be about 13 years old.

Lower Images:

     Two comparison strips of images known or suspected to be of James Perry Pierce images - a short one of CT images (Crittenden Tintypes;see also MISC 012B), and a long one of images from all other pages (see also MISC 012A).

  


CT0017-500.jpg CT0017

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Samuel George Cochran
comparison Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Mary Cochran
comparison Mary (Cochran) Miller (1858-1940), wife of Luther Miller-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Dora Ann Cochran
comparison Dora Ann (Cochran) Rodgers (1867-1951)-800h.jpg

 

CT0017:  Tintype,  (~2½x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Four children of John Thomas Cochran (1834-1904) and his wives, 1) Sarah Jane Ross (1831-1860), and 2) Nancy Rebecca Moxley (1843-1923).

1st R-L:  Anna Cochran (1870-1960),

2nd R-L:  Samuel George Cochran (1875-1950),

3rd R-L:  Mary Cochran (1858-1940),

4th R-L:  Dora Ann Cochran (1867-1951).

     Samuel George Cochran is recognizable from his slicked-down hairstyle (reversed in CT0017 from a similar comb-down in C 062), his slanting smile, and large ear lobes (that seem to be lobes all the Cochrans seem to have).  For some reason, the three sisters are pudgier than they look in any other photo.  Their faces do look like other photos though, as one can see in the strips below.  It is thought that Sarah Cochran is the sister not present here, just as she was the only sister not present in C 062, the best image for identifying Cochrans.

Date:  c.1888; Samuel appears to be about 13, and Dora about 17.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran (see MISC 66), Samuel Cochran (see MISC 64), Mary Cochran (see MISC 69) and Dora Cochran (see MISC 74).

  


CT0018-500.jpg CT0018

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

 

CT0018:  Tintype,  (~2½x4"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Anna Cochran (1870-1960)., daughter of John Thomas Cochran (1834-1904) and his 2nd wife, Nancy Rebecca Moxley (1843-1923).

Date:  c.1881; she appears to be about 11 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran (see MISC 66).

  


CT0019-500.jpg CT0019

comparison Luther Miller (1856-1946)-800h.jpg

 

CT0019:  Tintype,  (~2½x4"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Luther Miller (1856-1946).

Date:  c.1886; he appears to be about 30 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Luther Miller (see also MISC 68).

  


CT0020-500.jpg CT0020

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

 

CT0020:  Tintype,  (~2¼x4"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject: 

Anna Cochran (1870-1960).

Date:  c.1888; she appears to be about 18 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran (see MISC 66).

  


CT0021-500.jpg CT0021

Images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran
comparison Anna (Cochran) Rochester (1870-1960)-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Dora Ann Cochran
comparison Dora Ann (Cochran) Rodgers (1867-1951)-800h.jpg

 

CT0021:  Tintype,  (~2½x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject: 

Left:  Anna Cochran (1870-1960),

Right:  Dora Ann Cochran (1867-1951).

Date:  c.1881; Anna appears to be about 11 years old, Dora about 13.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Anna Cochran (see MISC 66)  and Dora Ann Cochran (see MISC 74).

  


CT0022-500.jpg CT0022



 

CT0022:  Tintype,  (~2½x4"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  unknown.

Date: 

Lower Image:

    


CT0023-James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-500.jpg CT0023

James Perry Pierce images from Crittenden Tintypes (CT) only:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)  CT only-800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from other Crittenden pages:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-800h.jpg


 

CT0023:  Tintype,  (~2¾x4"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  James Perry Pierce (1841-1916).

Date:  c.1859; he appears to be about 18 years old.

Lower Images:

     Two comparison strips of images known or suspected to be of James Perry Pierce images - a short one of CT images (Crittenden Tintypes;see also MISC 012B), and a long one of images from all other pages (see also MISC 012A).

  


CT0024-500.jpg CT0024

Images known or suspected to be of Mary Cochran
comparison Mary (Cochran) Miller (1858-1940), wife of Luther Miller-800h.jpg

Images known or suspected to be of Sarah Elizabeth Cochran
comparison Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926)-800h.jpg

 

CT0024:  Tintype,  (~2¼x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject: 

Left:  Mary Cochran (1858-1940),

Right:  Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (1859-1926).

Date:  c.1880; they appear to be about in their early 20's.

Lower Images:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Mary Ann Cochran (see MISC 69)and Sarah Elizabeth Cochran (see MISC 73).

  


CT0025-James Perry Pierce (left) and Luther Miller (right)-500.jpg CT0025

James Perry Pierce images from Crittenden Tintypes (CT) only:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)  CT only-800h.jpg

James Perry Pierce images from other Crittenden pages:

comparison James Perry Pierce (1841-1916)-800h.jpg

Luther Miller images from all image collections 

comparison Luther Miller (1856-1946)-800h.jpg

 

CT0025:  Tintype,  (~2½x3¾"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  Left: James Perry Pierce (1841-1916); Right: Luther Miller (1856-1946)

     James P. Pierce was a farmer in Gallatin Co., IL in 1870.  In the same census, Luther Miller was a farm laborer in Enfield TN, White Co., IL, the county north of Gallatin Co.

Date:  c.1886; Pierce could be 45 years old and Miller appears to be about 30 years old.

Lower Images:

     Two comparison strips of images known or suspected to be of James Perry Pierce images - a short one of CT images (Crittenden Tintypes;see also MISC 012B), and a long one of images from all other pages (see also MISC 012A).  Also, Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Luther Miller (see also MISC 68).

  


CT0026--500.jpg CT0026

 

CT0026:  Tintype,  (~4¼x3¼"), unmarked as to subject or date.

Photographer:  unmarked.

Subject:  unknown. 

Date:  c.1875; he appears to be about 30 years old.

Lower Image:

     Comparison of images known or suspected to be of Darius B. Carnahan (see also MISC 55).

  

 

 

 

Back to Photograph Albums of the Extended family of James Frank Pierce (1918 - 1973) and Helene Mae Vaubel (1919 - 2003)